During his ten-year tenure as prefect, Pilate had numerous confrontations with the Jewish people. According to Jewish historian Josephus, Pilate's decision to bring into the holy city of Jerusalem "by night and under cover effigies of Caesar" outraged Jews who considered the images idolatrous. Jews carried their protest to Pilate's base in Caesaria. Pilate threatened the protesters with death, but when they appeared willing to accept martyrdom he relented and removed the offending images. Also from Josephus we learn that Pilate provoked a different outcry from his Jewish subjects when he used Temple funds to build an aqueduct.
According to Philo writing in 41 A.D., Pilate's lack of concern for Jewish sensibilities was accompanied by corruption and brutality. Philo wrote that Pilate's tenure was associated with "briberies, insults, robberies, outrages, wanton injustices, constantly repeated executions without trial, and ceaseless and grievous cruelty." Philo may have overstated the case, but there is little to suggest that Pilate would have any serious reservations about executing a Jewish rabble-rouser such as Jesus.
Although Pilate spent most of his time in the coastal town of Caesaria, he traveled to Jerusalem for important Jewish festivals. While in Jerusalem, he stayed in what was called the praetorium. This was either a former palace of Herod the Great or the Antonia fortress located at the northwest corner of the Temple Mount. Josephus believed that Pilate resided at the palace.
Gospel accounts of the trial of Jesus suggest that Pilate either played no direct role in the decision to execute Jesus, or that he ordered the crucifixion of Jesus with some reluctance (Mark, Luke, and John). Some historians believe these accounts were created as Christian efforts to make their message more palatable to Roman audiences. Prefects had a variety of options available for dealing with potential troublemakers like Jesus, including flogging, sending the matter back to the Sanhedrin, or referring the case to Herod Antipas, ruler of Galilee.
Given what is known about Pilate's concern with crowd control, it is unlikely that he would not quickly agree to a request from high Jewish officials to deal harshly with someone claiming to be "King of the Jews." He knew that past messianic claims had led to civil unrest, so he may have been eager to end the potential threat to the existing order. The use of crucifixion establishes that Jesus was condemned as a violator of Roman, not Jewish, law.
Pilate's repeated difficulties with his Jewish subjects was the apparent cause of his removal from office in 36 C.E. by Syrian governor Vitellius. Following his removal from office, Pilate was ordered to Rome to face complaints of excessive cruelty. From there, he was exiled in Vienne, France.
