The Manuscripts of the Gospels

The Gospels in Early Christian Quotations

Historical illustration for The Gospels in Early Christian Quotations
Historical illustration

Introduction

The surviving copies of the four Gospels are not our only witnesses to their ancient wording. Early Christian authors repeatedly quoted, discussed, and explained passages from Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Their writings preserve another extensive body of evidence for the Gospel text. These quotations are especially valuable because many can be associated with identifiable authors, periods, and regions. They help establish which Gospel passages were known to Christian communities long before most surviving medieval manuscripts were produced.

Historical Background

During the second and third centuries, Christian teachers and writers increasingly appealed to the Gospels when explaining the faith, defending Christian beliefs, and instructing congregations. Some quoted passages directly, while others summarized or paraphrased their contents.

Justin Martyr, writing in the middle of the second century, referred to accounts of Jesus that he called memoirs of the apostles. His writings preserve numerous parallels with Gospel material, although identifying the exact written source behind every passage is not always possible.

Irenaeus of Lyons, writing toward the end of the second century, explicitly defended the authority of four Gospels. His writings demonstrate that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were already recognized as a distinctive collection.

Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Origen, and later Christian writers quoted and interpreted Gospel passages extensively. Their works provide evidence of the text as it was known in different parts of the Christian world.

The Manuscript Evidence

Irenaeus is particularly important because he identifies the four Gospels by name and discusses their contents. In Against Heresies, he refers to passages from the Gospel narratives and preserves evidence of their circulation during the second century. His discussion of the ending of Mark is also significant. Irenaeus quotes Mark 16:19, demonstrating that the longer ending was known by the late second century, even though its place in the earliest form of Mark remains disputed.

Clement of Alexandria and Origen preserve numerous Gospel quotations from the late second and third centuries. Origen sometimes discusses differences between manuscripts, showing that textual variations were already recognized in antiquity.

Eusebius of Caesarea, writing in the fourth century, preserves information about earlier Christian authors and the Gospel manuscripts known in his time. His discussions provide evidence concerning the reception and transmission of particular passages. Later writers, including John Chrysostom and Augustine, preserve additional Gospel quotations. Their surviving works allow scholars to compare biblical readings across different centuries and regions.

Examining the Evidence

Quotations by early Christian authors are valuable because they may preserve Gospel readings from manuscripts that no longer survive. A writer quoting John in the third century provides evidence that a recognizable form of that passage was already in circulation. Such quotations must nevertheless be examined carefully. Ancient authors sometimes quoted from memory, shortened passages, combined expressions, or paraphrased the wording. Their own writings were also copied by later scribes, introducing another level of textual transmission.

For this reason, a quotation does not always establish the exact wording of the manuscript used by its author. Its evidential value depends upon how closely the passage is quoted, the reliability of the surviving text, and the historical circumstances of the writer. When quotations can be compared with surviving Gospel manuscripts, however, they provide an important additional line of evidence. Agreements may establish the antiquity of particular readings, while differences help scholars investigate the history of textual variation.

The Institute for New Testament Textual Research incorporates evidence from early Christian writers into its study of the New Testament text. Such quotations are therefore recognized as an important part of the surviving textual tradition.

Conclusion

The writings of early Christian authors substantially broaden the evidence for the preservation of the Gospels. They demonstrate that recognizable Gospel passages were being quoted, interpreted, and defended in Christian communities during the second and third centuries.

When considered alongside surviving Greek manuscripts and ancient translations, these quotations provide additional support for the continuity of the Gospel text. They also help establish that the four Gospels were known and used long before the production of many surviving biblical codices.

Related Ancient Manuscripts

Sources and Further Reading

  1. Eusebius: Ecclesiastical History
    Eusebius of Caesarea. Ecclesiastical History. Early fourth century AD.
    Eusebius and early Christian testimony.
  2. Origen: Commentaries on Matthew and John
    Origen. Commentary on Matthew and Commentary on John. Third century AD.
    Origen and Gospel quotations.
  3. Justin Martyr: First Apology and Dialogue with Trypho
    Justin Martyr. First Apology and Dialogue with Trypho. Second century AD.
    Justin Martyr and early Gospel reception.
  4. Irenaeus: Against Heresies
    Irenaeus of Lyons. Against Heresies, especially 3.11.8 and 3.10.5.
    Irenaeus and the fourfold Gospel.

Irenaeus, Against Heresies, especially 3.11.8; Justin Martyr, First Apology and Dialogue with Trypho; Origen, Commentary on Matthew and Commentary on John; Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History; Institute for New Testament Textual Research, How Patristic Citations Are Treated in the Editio Critica Maior; Bruce M. Metzger and Bart D. Ehrman, The Text of the New Testament, fourth edition (2005).